"Distinctions are one kind of meme. They are ways of carving up the world by categorizing or labeling things."
The part I found particularly interesting about this distinction-meme is that when you choose this particular distinction-meme (whatever that may be) you now start to "see" certain kinds of things, but lose sight of others. It's almost like you've put on a pair of glasses that filter our certain kinds of light. The important part of this distinction-meme concept, in my opinion, is to really be aware of what distinction-memes you have been programmed with; and to keep in mind that you (you referring to that particular group of humans spreading that meme) have invented this particular distinction, and, along with all other distinction-memes, it's not "reality." To quote Brodie:
"If you see it's a meme, and not the Truth, you open up the possibility of other memes to talk about the same thing."
I'm now thinking to myself, because I've chosen to follow a particular approach to testing (I've chosen this distinction-meme), "What kinds of things have I gained access to by adopting this approach, and what things have I lost sight of?" Let's say it's the distinction-meme of the Context Driven school. Seeing as it's an approach I've chosen to be infected with, I think one of the benefits of the Context Drive school is that it focuses on testers being "aware" of what's going on while they test. Now, remember, the distinction-meme states that "it's useful to be conscious of what distinction-memes you're programmed with" as this helps you be aware of why you have these distinctions -- and that you are not just blindly adopting them. As one of the basic principles of the context approach states:
There are good practices in context, but there are no best practices.
What distinction-memes were the founders of the context-driven approach infected with? Why did they chose to replicate those particular memes. I need to find out more.
No comments:
Post a Comment